I’m not exactly familiar with Alita: Battle Angel, but like Akira, I’m aware of its impact on pop-culture. I was curious to see what Robert Rodriguez and James Cameron had to offer with this film. The legendary James Cameron wrote this adaptation, but arguably hasn’t really done anything “great” since Titanic. Avatar was, fine, but I think its legacy is dependent on the launch of the current version of 3D films, but I digress-I’ll have this conversation with you soon since production on Avatar 2 has recently been completed. In the end, Alita was visually stunning, but at the same time somewhat lacking. It’s ultimately an okay movie to watch on the road to Cyberpunk 2077, but it’s decidedly low on content that makes the genre so impactful and important.
Alita: Battle Angel takes place in the year 2563, some 300 years after a cataclysmic war dubbed “The Fall”. In the wreckage, humanity amassed and rebuilt at Iron City, a hodgepodge city underneath the last remaining sky city, Zalem. It’s here where Dr. Dyson Ido (Christoph Waltz) discovers a broken cyborg body with a very intact human brain. He takes the brain and gives it a new body, which is the “birth” of Alita (Rosa Salazar), a girl with a bad case of amnesia and a very distracting pair of distracting CGI eyes. She can speak and do normal tasks but has no idea who she was prior in life. She meets Hugo (Keenan Johnson), a teenager who secretly hunts down cyborgs for parts in order to sell them to Vector (Mahershala Ali). Hugo is definitely the weak link in the movie as the romantic love interest and is ultimately quite bland. Meanwhile, we learn the good doctor’s motives for creating Alita stems from the loss of his daughter, which caused his ex-wife (Jennifer Connley) to begin working for Vector.
But wait, there’s more. Alita learns about the high stakes game of Motorball and the bounty-hunter society and serial killing cyborgs. Oh, and there’s the backstory about the war and why there’s a floating city for the elite when the poor and scum of society live below. Yeah, there’s a lot going on here, which is the main problem with Alita. It’s cool, and there’s certainly potential and it’s certainly fun, but it never tries to be anything other than a two-hour action movie. It’s overflowing with so many subplots, characters and factions than its limited runtime could possibly handle.
The movie never explores the concept of humanity or the soul either. I can’t speak to the source material as I’m not familiar with it, but considering how augmentations and the replacement of body parts is so prevalent in the movie, one might expect the script to ask the question “what is human”? What makes science fiction, and by extension, the cyberpunk genre, so interesting is that it asks these questions. What is a soul and how much can you take away from yourself until there’s nothing left? Is there such a thing as “more human than human?” The film never pauses to ask these questions and I think that was a missed opportunity, as it keeps Alita rooted as a generic action flick with cool visuals.
There will be a lot more Cyberpunk stories to talk about before Cyberpunk 2077’s release. For now, if you are interested in Alita, take it for what it is. It’s a fun action romp with a unique visual style, but is lacking in depth or any real stakes. If you’re looking for something with a little more depth, then the live-action adaptation of Ghost in the Shell may be a better way to spend your time.
2 thoughts on “‘The Road to ‘Cyberpunk 2077′: Alita: Battle Angel’ May Have Been Better As A Series – ScreenHub Entertainment”